I am As I Is - No Refunds
I have to admit, I am not very well read in terms of the classics. I find this shameful because I think the primary reason I rejected reading so many of them was due to my teachers' unimaginative interpretation of the required literature. This turned me off from trying to read anything considered "good for me" because if the establishment thought it was good for me, it must not be something I wanted to be a part of. If the only way to understand the book was according to the Cliffs Notes version, I wasn't interested.
Another reason I think this void in my literary education it is terrible is that the older I get, the more I run across quotations of brilliant authors whose words resonate with me. It saddens me I didn't have their works a part of my developmental make up. On the other hand, there is some pride in having come to these same insights without having been influenced by the great thinkers, but I suspect I would have been better off having been exposed to these writers if I hadn't been so damn stubborn.
It isn't too late, I'm a fast reader and I plan to do catching up. One author in particular keeps rising to the top of my list, Oscar Wilde. I did manage to read "The Picture of Dorian Gray" back in college. I did read it without it being part of coursework and completely loved the novel. Which makes me wonder why I didn't read more Wilde then (see: my stubborness). The man has said many things that make my eyes widen in awe. One of his ideas is that "The basis of optimism is sheer terror." As a ridiculous optimist, I'm not sure what the hell that means, but the audacity of such a statement makes me grin. I guess, unlike me, Wilde was not an optimist. It doesn't deter me from adoring him all the more for his boldness. I don't agree at all with this sentiment, but I'd hardly want to argue with him on it. It seems a waste of time to convince someone who isn't an optimist your point of view. And a bummer at that. Especially since I will prove right in the end unless I let the bastards bring me down.
The Wilde quote I have on my mind tonight is "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." I find this an apt observation on many levels, not the least of which is the sheer number of blogs and my space pages out there with more deep dark secrets exposed than one would ever imagine. But even those pages with incriminating photos attached to some degree are a mask, with the internet acting as a filter. To those who are not in our real lives, we can become whomever we want to be.
I spent at least 80 percent of my life with a shield up. I wouldn't call it either a mask or being in my own person. I was going through the motions as a survival tactic. As I began to emerge, however, I don't think I ever learned to act as being separate from "in my own person" or wearing a mask. The most I would ever do was refrain from saying anything or give my honest assessment. What I write in my blog is pretty much the same way I present in real life. Maybe with a better word structure and I'm always glad to not have to worry about pronunciation.
I might also wax on and on about a subject here that people in my real life would have checked out on long before I was done talking about it. That's part of the beauty of having a blog where I can gab to my little heart's content.
But I think the internet is a very safe place for people to anonymously share their inner selves, things they dare not put out for the masses to see for fear of ridicule and rejection. I can't decide how I perceive this phenomena. Some of what gets written is just, well, in my opinion, drivel (and, hey, I am not discounting that some, if not all, of what pours outta me doesn't qualify for that category). And I think the internet is a fabulous way for people to have an audience for every stray firing of their neurons. Chances are some other wacko out there can related and *presto*, you have a new buddy. Would this friendship hold in real life, however? This is where I am unsure. Is the mask of the internet really enabling people to be completely honest, or does it set up another way for people to become what they wish to be rather than who they are. Maybe they speak the truth about their feelings, but not about themselves.
And, of course, it is easy to idealize people you only talk to online and don't depend on day to day in real life. The news is full of these stories. I've personally been guilty of this.
I'm still obsessing over what is truth and my quest for authenticity, which has me toodling with these thoughts. My book's overall theme is about making connections with people. My main character is someone who had never been good at making them at the beginning of her life, but is making the attempt to change that while not having any blueprint for doing so, including family support. Like me, she is looking for people who are real, people she can trust, but not necessarily people see things the same way as she does. People with which to share and explore the journey of life.
I'm wondering if writing fiction is a type of mask for telling the truth. A few people suggested I write an autobiography, but honestly I have zero desire to do such a thing. For one, I feel it would be terribly hurtful to my family. I don't have any need to have the world vilify them for what they did to me. I don't think anyone will be served by publicly exposing them. The progress I have made in trying to heal and build whatever tentative relationship we have now, while nowhere near a normal family relationship, is not something I wish to jeopardize. Second, I don't feel comfortable revealing the details of everything. There are things I can't even discuss with my therapist yet. Some memories make me fill up with a silent scream that I don't have any intention to put on paper for the world to see.
However, there is a place for all of these to be fictionalized and come out in a way that is cathartic for me, and perhaps helpful for people reading. Does that make me false for putting it in another character's hands? I don't think so. I think I am still working through the part of me that is unsteady about my family's accusations that I am a liar and a bad person, but the more well I become, the more their critical voices fall away. Stupid, rambling blog posts like this help me wring out their taunts.
I will close this post with another favorite Oscar Wilde quote: "The well bred contradict other people. The wise contradict themselves."
I was raised to be well bred, but, damn if I don't think I've ended up wise and feel kind of dumb for it. Contradictory isn't the same as hypocrite, right? I checked the thesaurus. Whew. I should be able to sleep now.
PS I hate late night TV commercials. If I see another ad for ExtendZe, I may put a plastic bag over my head.
PSS I hit 46,144 words for NaNoWriMo today. :) I think the whole novel will end up being just under 100,000 words, but when I hit 50K, I will have achieved the goal of NaNoWriMo, and well before the deadline. Woot!



